| Choose your weapon Cordless
tool makers battle over power by
Clair Urbain and Paul Arnold Power tool
manufacturers are battling over which is the best battery to power
cordless tools. Nickel-metal hydride cells promise longer run times.
Nickel-cadmium cells declare longer cycle life and an ability to
withstand the cold. Which is the better battery? Available
since 1998, some say the Ni-MH is the wave of the future. But others
believe this techno-leap may not be such a big step. The
3.0 amp-hour-rated Ni-MH cells offer longer run times than their 2.0
or 2.5 amp-hour-rated nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) counterparts. Amp-hours
(Ah) is the rating for how long a battery will power a tool before it
needs recharging. Companies
manufacturing tools powered by 3.0 Ah Ni-MH batteries tout run times
up to 50 percent greater than tools powered by 2.0 Ah Ni-Cd batteries,
and a 25 percent advantage when comparing 2.2 Ah Ni-MH batteries to
2.0 Ni-Cd cells. However, some cordless
tool makers believe Ni-MH cells have shorter cycle lives than the less
expensive, more experienced Ni-Cd units on the market. It's
a point of confusion that could cause some to shy away from the newer
technology. Cycle life is the number of
charge/discharge cycles a battery will go through before it
fails. DeWalt research shows that in
controlled tests, Ni-MH batteries typically go through 250 to 500
charge/discharge cycles before failure. The company says today's Ni-Cds
offer nearly twice that. "We
are seeing Ni-MH power tools costing more than Ni-Cd power tools, but
workers are getting as little as a quarter of the cycle life from the
batteries when compared with Ni-Cds," says Pete Rosenquist, senior
product manager for cordless tools at DeWalt. Others
cite similar findings. "It
is true that Ni-MH cells will run a tool longer between charges, but
we've seen the number of times that battery can be charged is
considerably less than a Ni-Cd battery," says E.J. Loferski, cordless
tool product manager at Milwaukee Electric Tool. In
its tests, Ni-MH cells racked up 400 to 500 charges, compared to 800
for Ni-Cd cells. Both DeWalt and
Milwaukee Electric currently sell only tools powered by Ni-Cd cells,
but Milwaukee plans to offer accessory Ni-MH batteries in the near
future. Other manufacturers of cordless
tools see few, if any, weaknesses in Ni-MH. Ken
Hefley, vice president of marketing for Makita, a pioneer in the Ni-MH-powered
tool market, calls the cycle life difference between the two formats "minimal,
at best." "We
claim that the charged cycle life difference between 2.0 Ah Ni-Cd and
2.2 Ah Ni-MH is less than 10 percent," he says. "At the same time, the
2.2 Ah Ni-MH exhibits 25 percent more capacity. The offsetting gain in
capacity against the margin loss in cycle life equates to 13 percent
more lifetime work for the battery. That's why Makita is sold on Ni-MH." Doug
Bock, national sales manager at Panasonic, which makes cordless tools
with Ni-MH and Ni-Cd cells as well as supplies Ni-Cd and Ni-MH cells
to a variety of tool manufacturers, says Ni-MH cells, when charged
correctly, last as long as Ni-Cd cells. " The
charger is the key ingredient," he says. "Our battery charger fully
charges the Ni-MH battery each time. The cycle life is approximately
1,200 times, which is consistent with Ni-Cd cycle life." Battling
the cold?
Another point of contention is operating temperature. Milwaukee
Electric's Loferski and DeWalt's Rosenquist state Ni-MH batteries have
a narrower operating temperature when compared with Ni-Cd batteries.
Loferski estimates Ni-MH batteries work best between 40 and 105
degrees F. "We
have seen power drop severely under 40 F," he says. "When the battery
temperature is at freezing or below, Ni-MH batteries won't work at
all, where Ni-Cd batteries will put out power at temperatures as low
as 0 F." Panasonic's Bock admits the two
cell formats react differently to cold temperatures, but calls the
difference a non-issue. "It's a chemical fact that power from Ni-MH
cells will drop off at lower temperatures," he says. "However, we have
been marketing the technology for almost one year now and our
experience with units in the field is that perceptible power loss at
lower temperatures has not been an issue." Makita's
Hefley takes Bock's comments a step further. While admitting a cold
temperature problem did exist in the battery's early testing stages,
Hefley says those problems were eliminated before his company put a
Ni-MH-powered product on the market. "We
have a patented process that conditions each battery before it leaves
the factory," he says. "The battery will withstand and endure all cold
temperature applications in the market today." Makita
used an unconventional test recently to prove its case. "We
submersed a Ni-MH battery in a bucket of water, froze it solid as a
rock, took a device to crack the battery out of the ice, and then
plugged it into a drill and ran screws with it," says Hefley. Environmental
issue
Concern for the environment is one of the most compelling reasons for
selecting Ni-MH over Ni-Cd. Ni-Cd cells
contain cadmium, a toxic heavy metal that shouldn't be discarded in
sanitary landfills. These cells can be recycled, though, and more
recycling centers are accepting these batteries than in the
past. Ni-MH cells don't have disposal
issues. They aren't toxic, so they can be discarded in normal
trash. Is cost a concern?
Milwaukee Electric Tool and DeWalt cite that initial cost of Ni-MH
tools is higher than Ni-Cd tools. Combine that with their argument
that the batteries don't last as long, and they make a compelling case
to stick with Ni-Cd-powered tools. "Panasonic
has been selling Ni-MH-powered tools for 10 months, and they have been
as much as 30 percent more expensive than Ni-Cd units," says
Bock. Says Hefley: "You're going to pay
a higher price for a better product." But,
as with any high-tech device, the price margin narrows over
time. Panasonic recently introduced a
line of drill/drivers and a hammer drill powered by Ni-MH cells that
cost the same as its Ni-Cd versions. This article originally
appeared in the May/June '00 issue of Progressive Distributor.
Copyright 2000. back
to top
back
to Product Sales Training archives |