|
Watts up
Helping customers understand power
tool ratings
by Clair Urbain
If your customers use tool ratings as
the sole criteria to select power tools, they may be cheating
themselves, say leading power tool manufacturers.
Instead, tool experts say you should
look at the ratings as a way to classify the tool’s power and
capabilities. They caution users not to base tool selection on a tenth
more horsepower or a few tenths more amps than a similar model of
another brand.
“It’s unfortunate how tool users
look to ratings as a true indication of how much work a tool may
do,” says Bob Wanke, trainer at Milwaukee Electric Tool. “It’s
much more important to look at the range of jobs a tool can do, then
get opinions from other heavy-duty users about what works well and
what lasts.”
However, tool manufacturers do not
follow the same protocol when developing tool ratings. That’s what
makes using ratings alone as a guide for tool selection a bad
practice.
The best rating to use to compare tool
power is maximum watts out, says Vinny Lupenski, director of product
management/saws at DeWalt.
“Most professional tool users look to
amps to compare tools, but two tools with the same amp rating may not
perform the same. The watts coming out of the tool is a better measure
of usable power,” he says.
Wanke says the amp ratings of drills,
drivers and saws only gives you an idea of how much heat the unit can
handle before excessive heat buildup will damage the motor. It should
not be the sole criteria upon which to select these tools.
Like amp ratings, horsepower ratings
are not an accurate guide of tool power.
“In most cases, a tool with a higher
amp or horsepower rating should be able to handle heavier loads. But
this isn’t always the case because the ratings do not consider how
effectively the tool’s mechanical components transfer power from the
motor to the accessory,” says Wanke. “Technically, horsepower is a
measurement of mechanical power and figured by multiplying speed and
torque. It is a measure of motor power and does not account for how
the power is transferred to the blade or bit.”
According to Milwaukee Electric’s
Tool Fundamentals reference guide, mechanical power, or horsepower, is
the product of RPM and torque. RPM is a straightforward measurement,
but torque may not be.
Torque is the amount of force applied
to a system multiplied by the distance of that force from the
rotational axis. That means the further you get from the axis, the
greater the mechanical advantage. How tool manufacturers measure
torque can greatly affect subsequent rated horsepower.
External factors also affect true amp
and horsepower ratings. Accessory type and size, the work material,
tool and ambient temperature affect tool ratings. To accurately
compare tools from different manufacturers, these variables must be
held constant. Since power tool companies have unique methods to
assign power ratings, just taking specs out of the tool catalog sets
you up for apples-and-oranges comparisons.
Recently, power tool manufacturers have
started listing horsepower ratings as peak or maximum horsepower.
That’s because there has been some controversy as to whether a
4-horsepower tool can indeed produce 4 horsepower.
“We have found that professional tool
users rarely look at horsepower as a measure for tool power,” says
Rich Hurn, director of engineering at DeWalt. “But they still look
at amps. Again, the watts-out rating is the best measure of tool
power.”
So if the total or maximum watts-out
rating is the best measure, at what point does it make a difference
when comparing two tools?
“I’d suggest users look at amps
first to broadly classify tool power then drill down to the watts-out
ratings to compare similar amp-rated tools more carefully,” says
Lupenski. “You won’t see much performance difference in a circular
saw with 2,000 watts vs. a saw with 2,075 watts, but you will see a
difference in a saw that has only 1,700 watts out.”
Experienced users know there is more to
a tool than its specifications, and tool manufacturers are eager to
point that out.
In the final selection process, tool
manufacturers suggest customers base their final decision on how the
following components stack up:
• Motor
windings: the more copper, the better
• Ball or roller
bearings: can withstand more force and abuse than sleeve bearings
• Heat-treated and
machined gears: for long life and more efficient power transfer
• Quality cords:
long, chemical-resistant cords that stay flexible in all weather
conditions
• Quality switches
with amp ratings that meet or exceed the tool’s amp rating
• Interlocking tool
housings: they hold drive components in alignment and help the tool
withstand drops and heavy loads
• Ergonomics: how the
tool feels in your hand, considering the jobs you’ll do with the
tool
• Warranty: the
longer, the better
• Access to
service and repair
Tool manufacturers are constantly
improving tools, so when customers are replacing a tool, they should
look at what the latest models offer, suggests Lupenski.
“Word of mouth is one of the best
ways to learn about what works and doesn’t work for contractors, but
always look at the new tool models. You’re going to continue to see
more powerful units in more compact, easier-to-use designs,” he
says.
DeWalt’s Hurn agrees.
“We design tools for a five-year
minimum life with the most demanding user and find that contractors,
on average, replace tools every two years because they get lost,
stolen, run over or dropped. The tools are changing dramatically.
“The new power tools will have the
same amp rating as older models, but the watts-out rating will
continue to increase. That’s why you need to look at watts-out
ratings to measure a tool’s power,” he says.
Excerpted from Contractor Tools
and Supplies magazine. Clair Urbain is the magazine’s editor.
This article appeared in the May/June 2001 issue of
Progressive Distributor. Copyright
2001.
back to top
back
to product sales training archives
|