You
get what you pay for
by Rich
Vurva
I remember talking
with a distributor friend a few years ago about his desire to change
his company's compensation system. Salespeople at the company he
acquired were paid under two separate structures. Some earned a high
base salary with very low at-risk pay, while others received a low
base with a much higher at-risk element. He discovered that the
salespeople who received the higher base pay actually underperformed
the sellers who earned the lower base pay. He revamped the comp plan
and put everyone on a low pay, high bonus system that rewarded
salespeople for achieving specific company objectives.
The problem my friend
encountered is similar to the one Scott Benfield writes about in the
story “All pay plans are not created equal,” which begins on page
18. He describes a situation where a distributor paid a higher
commission to salespeople for margin dollar increases above the prior
year. Since sales were high in the previous year, salespeople cut
price the next year to drive margin dollars above the prior year in
order to earn their bonus reward.
The company hoped to
motivate salespeople to increase business by offering a higher bonus,
but salespeople manipulated the system to line their own pockets at
the company’s expense. As Benfield explains, the problem resulted
from a compensation system based on a single metric. For example, if a
company rewards salespeople on top-line sales or margin dollars
without attention to pricing, some salespeople will simply cut price
to reach sales or margin dollar goals. Other salespeople may give
services away to entice customers to place an order, regardless of how
much it costs the company to provide the services.
He argues that
companies are better served by devising balanced compensation programs
that align individual behavior with company goals. His article
suggests some ways to accomplish that objective.
The
story is excerpted from the upcoming book “Restructuring the
Distribution Sales Effort for Maximum Productivity,” co-authored
by Benfield and myself. It will be available for purchase later this
fall.
This editorial appeared in the
September 2005 issue of Progressive Distributor magazine.
Copyright 2005.
back to top
back to editorial archives |