|
Advice on running a successful Distributor Advisory
Council
by Ed
Runner
Bill
Younger, former head of sales at Allen Bradley, is fond of saying,
“Using Distributor Advisory Councils is a great idea that often does
not work.” A fair number of manufacturers and distributors would
agree.
Much
has been written about Distributor Advisory Councils. Over the
years, many manufacturers have had council meetings with varying
results. Why are some successful? Why do some fall short of their
potential? What makes a council successful?
For
the past 21 years, I’ve consulted full-time helping manufacturers
and distributors work together more successfully. I’ve organized or
sat in on a large number of Distributor Advisory Council meetings.
I’ll share some thoughts.
What
can the distributor do to help ensure participation in a council can
lead to better joint success? First, there are 10 suggestions the
distributor can follow to help make the council more successful.
Second, the distributor needs to be discerning when deciding in
which manufacturer’s council to participate.
How
can the distributor contribute to joint success?
1. Participate in “working” councils. Try to get the
manufacturer to avoid holding the council at a remote exotic
location. When a small number of distributors are invited to
participate in a council, others feel left out. If the location is
exotic and plush, this adds to the rift. If this is a working
council, make it work during meeting time. Golfing and fishing can
come before or after the meeting. If this is a reward trip, it
should be called a President’s Club, Goal Busters, or something
else. Most distributors can afford their own vacations. Mixing
rewards and working councils tends to confuse people.
2. Come prepared to work. If there is prep work, do it. Try
to identify the big issues for distributors prior to the meeting.
Read over notes from previous meetings to see what issues have been
left hanging. Some years ago at a council meeting, a distributor
told me their Hanging Issue List had not changed in five years. Talk
to other distributors before the meeting if you have time. Don’t
wing it. The manufacturer needs your best thoughts on the network
and the market.
3. Listen behind what is being said. In complex issues and
relationships, often the articulated comment is a symptom of what
needs to be uncovered and dealt with. Look for the idea the speaker
is trying to articulate. Listen to the comments of the manufacturer
and other distributor participants for the important or underlying
issues. We don’t always speak clearly, especially in open
discussion.
4. Speak from what you see and know. Distributors tend to be
very good at stating their personal view. I do not find distributors
to be particularly good at designing a manufacturer’s market or
channel strategy. I also do not find most distributors are good at
speaking on what is best for the whole distributor network. My
belief is that distributors are generally action-oriented
entrepreneurs. They are very good at speaking for themselves.
5. Focus on what’s best for the whole network. This is not a
meeting for personal issues that do not affect others. Try to
balance what you’d like for your firm with what might be best for
the manufacturer and the network. Joe Spedale, national distributor
sales manager for Omron Electronics Factory Automation Products,
says, “In my experience, councils can become a forum for adversarial
negotiations if one party is looking to impose their will on the
other.” Look for compromises that help joint success. Look for ideas
or solutions that can help the system get better.
6. Speak up to try and make the council responsible and productive.
Be willing to get up and leave if the council is not productive.
Sitting passively in a meeting that is not productive or that is
ignoring big issues allows others to think progress is being made or
critical issues are being handled.
7. Avoid simplistic thinking. Too often both manufacturers
and distributors have a naïve image of how things are or how things
need to be. There is often an overwhelming tendency to look for a
quick or easy answer. Beware those who propose overly simplistic
analysis or suggestions. In distribution channels, almost everything
is a trade-off. Try to identify the trade-off cost to each idea.
8. Don’t take advantage and lobby for special treatment.
Avoid using the council seat as an opportunity to gain special
treatment or an unfair advantage that can undermine the council and
might be illegal. This damages the trust in the participants, the
council process, the manufacturer, and the network.
9. Try to deal with substantive issues that can really improve
network performance in a significant way. Try to avoid
having the council deal only with irritations or minor issues. Both
sides may feel more productive solving simple problems and
correcting irritations. The problem is, when all the irritations are
corrected, no one is really stronger, motivated or improved. Be a
positive participant and avoid negative behavior. Included in
negative participation would be gossip about factory field people or
distributors who are not in the room.
10. Don’t do anything illegal. In discussions with the
manufacturer and with other distributors, make sure you are not
participating in any illegal discussions or agreements. You may not
get in trouble with the law, but you may risk your participation on
the council and your place in the network. If you support other
competing manufacturers, honor those relationships.
Which manufacturer?
Distributors should be encouraged to give careful thought as to
which councils they serve. The distributor’s time is valuable. It
might be productive to try to participate on councils where the
manufacturer demonstrates the following:
1. Listens. “Too often some manufacturers just talk at the
distributors. This doesn’t accomplish anything,” says Interlynx
Systems’ Larry White, who consults with companies on improving the
performance of their selling organizations.
2. Is pledged to take action on some council recommendations.
Few things are as discouraging as participating in a council where
there is little positive follow-up action. Distributors love to talk
about and support the suppliers that take action on council
recommendations. It helps if the manufacturer has demonstrated an
ability to differentiate between normal irritations and issues
critical to joint success in the market.
3. Has a commitment to distribution. A high level of
commitment by the manufacturer fuels a healthy and proactive
network. One of the more popular questions right now in annual
channel partner surveys is: “How do you rate us on our commitment to
distribution compared to your other suppliers.”
4. Demonstrates an understanding of the distributor’s view of his or
her business. One of the most frequent complaints from
distributors in annual surveys is: “This manufacturer does not
understand my view of my business.”
Good councils can have impact
There are many examples of good councils that have helped both the
manufacturer and distributors gain both market share and improved
profit by pooling information and ideas collectively. Accomplishing
this takes leadership, cooperation, clear roles, agendas that meet
the needs of both sides, and open sharing. A Distributor Advisory
Council is one of the manufacturer’s better tools, if it is well run
and productive. Today the business tendency is to focus on improving
efficiency. Instead, the better councils often focus on improving
the effectiveness of the channel or transforming the channel.
Often,
the wrong manufacturers use a council. A council is not a good tool
when the manufacturer lacks a market strategy, a clear channel
strategy, or a strategy on how to successfully sell using
multi-channel efforts. Sometimes the manufacturer’s other
communications tools are more appropriate.
My
observations lead me to believe that manufacturers with world-class
selling channels can make good use of a Distributor Advisory
Council. But, often they do not need one because they make good use
of sales calls, joint calls, conference calls, surveys, regional
meetings, newsletters, Internet boards, and letters to the field.
Joe Spedale of Omron offers: “If a manufacturer is truly interested
in partnering with distributors and their customers, they should
seek feedback more often than twice a year. They should utilize
input from different sources and levels of the network. More
frequent input from a variety of sources is probably more valuable
than the feedback from a meeting of a small number of distributor
principals in a council.”
I am a
fan of Distributor Advisory Councils if they are well run and
productive and if the manufacturer is prepared to lead. It’s hard to
summarize the potential of a good Distributor Advisory Council
better than Larry White has: “If it allows both parties to benefit,
it can be a very good tool.”
The
Distributor Advisory Council has the potential to improve
cooperation between the manufacturer and the distributors. It also
has the potential to energize the network. A council is one tool
that can help eliminate duplication, misunderstanding, and improve
joint success in both market share and profit.
Ed Runner is president of E.C. Runner & Associates
Inc. in Illinois. Since 1984, the company has worked to increase the
profitable performance of industrial distributor sales networks,
improve multi-channel selling efforts, and conduct confidential
distributor network surveys. He has facilitated more than 60
Distributor Advisory Councils. Reach him at
edrunner@ecrunner.com.
This article
originally appeared in the January/February issue of Progressive Distributor. Copyright 2006.
back to top
back to Distribution Management archives |