Proprietary product lines and their benefits to distributors
by
Daniel R. Siburg and William E. Siburg
Distribution can be defined as the marketing and merchandizing of
another company’s products. Manufacturers consider distribution to
be key a component of their marketing and sales strategies, because
distributors help create brand awareness through the sale of
manufacturers’ product lines to retailers and consumers. The
difficulty for distributors is that they have limited rights and
control over manufacturers’ product lines or brands even after the
distributors have helped to create retail and consumer demand.
|

Attention distributors!
Maximize
your sales force’s productivity. The new book Restructuring
the Distribution Sales Effort for Maximum Productivity,
from distribution industry consultant Scott Benfield and Progressive
Distributor editor Rich Vurva is available now. Did you know that inside and outside
sales forces are 30% to 40% of the typical distributor’s
operating expenses? To
learn more about this important book, click here.
|
|
An overview of the standard distribution agreement
Manufacturers’ distribution agreements are a unilateral partnership
that is controlled by the manufacturer and provides the distributor
with limited rights related to product lines and brands.
Distribution agreements often focus on what the distributor is
required to do to be allowed to continue distributing the
manufacturer’s product lines and brands. Distribution agreements
usually have a fixed term from one to five years.
Distribution agreements generally contain various clauses, covenants
and criteria to measure the distributor’s performance. Distribution
performance clauses can relate to, but are not limited to, sales
quotas, exclusive sales areas and marketing support on distributors’
for carrying the manufacturer’s product lines and brands.
Distribution agreements with exclusive sales areas may require the
distributor to sell only the manufacturer’s product lines and
brands.
Also, distribution agreements provide the distributor with limited
rights and recourse against the manufacturer when they discontinue
product lines or brands. Distribution agreements may have clauses
related to the renewal of the agreement and the ability to assign
the agreement to a third party. Control over the ability to be able
to assign a distribution agreement means that when the distributor
wants to sell its business to a third party, the manufacturer has
direct influence over to whom the distributor can sell the business.
The
result of all this is the distributor ends up working for the
manufacturer to help market and merchandize the manufacturer’s
products, while assuming most of the business risks and having
limited control over the manufacturer’s product lines and brands.
Reasons manufacturers cancel distribution agreements
Manufacturers cancel distribution agreements with distributors for
various reasons, including but not limited to, lack of sales
performance, poor customer service, distributor financial
instability, sales channel conflicts, and a desire on the part of
the manufacturer to improve gross margins.
One
of the most common reasons for the cancellation of a distribution
agreement is lack of sales performance by the distributor.
Manufacturers use distributors to help market, sell and support
their product lines and brands. Questionable customer service, real
or perceived, is another reason why manufacturers pull product lines
and brands from distributors. The financial stability of the
distributor is of key importance to the manufacturer. The
manufacturer needs to be confident that they will be paid, and that
their products lines and brands will always be available through
distribution sales channels.
Manufacturers also cancel agreements because of sales channel
conflicts between the manufacturer’s customers and the distributor’s
customers. Sales channel conflicts generally revolve around the
distributor offering steeper discounts to its customers than the
manufacturer does to its customers. Astonishingly, when a
distributor is selling high volumes of a manufacturer’s product
lines and brands, the manufacturer often determines that it is in
its best interest to start selling directly to the distributor’s
customers in an effort to increase the manufacturer’s gross margins
and bottom line.
When
a high-volume manufacturer’s proprietary product lines or brands are
pulled from a distributor, it can be financially devastating to the
distributor. The distributor has most likely scaled their business
operations, employee levels and business finances to accommodate the
added sales volume and profit produced by the manufacturer’s
proprietary product lines and brands.
Though some of a distributor’s costs may be variable and can be
reduced quickly, such as employee levels and marketing expenses,
these types of cost reduction are always disruptive to business
operations. Additionally, there are frequently fixed costs that
cannot be reduced quickly, such as warehouse and other facility
expenses, and the cost of capital equipment leased or purchased to
support the higher sales volumes. When distribution agreements are
cancelled for exceeding performance, distributors are painfully
reminded of the substantial risks and limited control inherent in
the standard distribution model.
The standard distribution model
The standard distribution model is a low-profit-margin model and
therefore contains a fundamentally high level of financial risk.
This financial risk manifests itself in a couple of ways.
First, the distributor has financial exposure relating to product
margins when the manufacturer increases the cost of the products to
the distributor. The distributor may be unable to pass on all, or
even a portion, of such cost increases to its customers. Second,
competitive pricing pressures can have a negative effect on the
distributor’s gross product margins. Pricing pressures can increase
when other distributors selling the same product line cut their
prices in an effort to increase market share, or when competitors’
product lines compete on price in the market. New product lines or
brands may also enter the market causing additional competitive
pricing pressures.
The
standard distribution model is financially risky for several other
reasons as well. First, the distributor does not control the rights
to the manufactured product lines and brands. This lack of ownership
rights leaves the distributor with no power to effectively control
the manufacturer’s product line and branding strategies.
Second, the distributor assumes host of ancillary product liability
risks, including customer returns, spoilage, slow moving inventory
and obsolescence resulting from such things as product packaging,
formula or technology changes.
Third, the distributor also carries the risk that new government
regulations may affect sales volumes and cause additional returns.
Finally, the standard distribution model has a long cash-flow cycle
that starts when the distributor buys and pays for products from the
manufacturer and ends when the final customer pays the distributor
for the purchased products.
A modified distribution model
Distributors seeking to limit their risk can use a modified
distribution model, based on the standard distribution model, but
with proprietary product lines and brands owned by the distributor.
In such a model the distributor’s propriety product lines and brands
have a lower cost of goods resulting in higher gross margins.
This
model is lower risk because the distributor owns the proprietary
product lines and brands. Ownership of the product lines and brands
provides the distributor with direct control of the sales channel,
product quality and brand image. Control over proprietary product
lines and brands also allows for increased control over gross margin
by allowing the distributor to more easily pass price increases on
to its customers. Distributors with proprietary product lines and
brands also have improved inventory management through better
control of product obsolescence due to packaging, formula or
technology changes.
In
general, distributors that have developed their own proprietary
product lines and brands can react more quickly to market needs and
changes. The cash requirement for starting a proprietary product
line and brand, including creating packaging and paying in advance
for large initial production runs, can use a large portion of a
company’s cash resources. The startup cost of a proprietary product
line can be equated to the cash requirements that a distributor has
when they start carrying a new manufacturer’s product line and make
their initial stocking purchases. While the upfront costs may be
greater, the distributor with its own proprietary product lines and
brands will, over time, have a stronger cash-flow cycle due to
better gross margins on their proprietary products.
How proprietary product lines and brands help a distributor
Proprietary product lines and brands provide a distributor with
complete ownership and control over their product lines and brands.
The distributor controls the product price, quality, branding and
image. With proprietary product lines and brands, the distributor’s
sales and marketing strategies are developed specifically to build
brand awareness for its own products.
Proprietary product lines and brands provide increased gross margins
and improved profitability for the distributor. Distributors are
able to utilize their established sales and marketing channels with
limited additional effort and expense to sell new and existing
customers their own proprietary products.
Leveraging existing sales personnel, catalogs, Web sites and
advertising to support proprietary products and brands helps cover
fixed and variable overhead costs, which improves profitability.
In
addition, the distributor with specialized proprietary product lines
and brands is more insulated from the competition. As the
distributor is the sole source for the specialized products, which
other distributors cannot provide, the distributor is allowed the
opportunity to sell its commodity products to the customer too. The
distributor that has proprietary product lines and brands realizes
higher gross margins, higher per-tax net operating income, and
ultimately, a higher value for the business.
Proprietary product lines increase the value of a distribution
business
Proprietary product lines and brands add great value to distribution
businesses. The ownership of the proprietary product lines and
brands provides enhanced control of the distributor’s customer base.
Proprietary product lines and brands provide a distribution business
with increased gross margin, profitability and improved cash flow
over time. The superior financial characteristics of proprietary
product lines and brands positively impacts cash, accounts
receivable, inventory and debt on the balance sheet. This in turn
provides the company with better liquidity. The combination of all
these benefits directly increases the valuation and sales price of a
distribution company.
If you would like to
learn more about how to create and manage proprietary product lines
and brands that will increase the value of your distribution
business, please contact The Siburg Company LLC at (480) 502-2800
or visit our website at
www.siburgco.com.
back to top
back
to online exclusives