|
Performance
reviews gone bad
How to avoid the
three most common problems that plague employee performance reviews
by
Dick Grote
If
you’ve ever conducted a performance appraisal with an employee, you
know about the awkward moments that sometimes arise. For example, the
employee who is silent, or makes excuses, or turns the conversation
around so that you’re caught up in irrelevancies.
Silences,
excuses and irrelevancies are the three most common
difficulties that arise in the course of discussing a performance
evaluation. You can overcome each of these by keeping firmly in
control with a few simple techniques.
Silences
Silences make us feel awkward. If the individual doesn’t answer a
question promptly, the reason may be that the person is uncomfortable
or doesn’t know what to say. It may also be a manipulative power
play.
Silence
can be used to intimidate. Make sure you’re not the one who’s
being intimidated. Ask a question and wait. When your anxiety level
rises to the point where you have to say something to break the
silence, simply ask, “Do I need to repeat the question?” That will
surely provoke a response. If it doesn’t, call the performance
appraisal meeting to a halt and explain what the word insubordination
means.
Excuses
Excuses are the most common discussion difficulty. The reason we find
them so difficult is that we typically deal with them so badly. We
foolishly argue with the merits of the excuse, and by doing so
legitimatize it.
While
it may not be a conscious choice, any time a person offers an excuse
for poor performance, the person proffering the excuse is trying to
absolve himself of personal responsibility. Our response needs to
focus not on the excuse but on the issue of personal responsibility.
Start
by agreeing with the fact of the excuse: “I agree, Mark. Having
deadlines that frequently change in the middle of a project does make
your work difficult.” Then put the responsibility back where it
belongs: “And as we’ve discussed before, changing deadlines is a
fact of life in our business. How are you planning to handle that
challenge so that you can make sure that your projects are always
ready when they’re needed?”
The
appraiser can increase the probability that the employee will change
and resolve a problem if the manager discusses the need for change in
terms of the choices the employee makes. We each have the capability
for choice. An effective appraisal discussion makes that fact clear to
the individual who might prefer to play the role of victim.
Irrelevancies
A final discussion dilemma appraisers confront is the irrelevancy
trap. All of a sudden, in the middle of a discussion, you realize that
the subject you’re talking about has nothing to do with the core
issue of the appraisee’s unacceptable performance.
Hot
tip
It is always appropriate for the manager to consider in
advance some possible approaches or solutions the employee
might use to solve a problem. But the responsibility for
finding a solution is the employee's; not the
manager’s.
If
the manager makes a suggestion that the employee accepts and
it subsequently turns out that the suggestion was not
effective in solving the problem, the employee can turn back
to the manager and say, “See! I did what you told me and it
didn’t work!”
So
while the manager may assist the employee by making
suggestions or offering guidance, the burden of actually
solving the problem and improving performance is always borne
by the individual. |
Labeling
an irrelevancy as such is unproductive. It only generates arguments.
Don’t waste your breath.
When
you discover that you’re in the middle of an active discussion of an
irrelevant topic, the technique to use is “dismiss and redirect.”
Wait until your counterpart pauses for breath and then say, “As far
as the way they used to handle this situation in your old company is
concerned, I’d like to talk about that separately. First, I need for
you to agree that you will let me know any time a project deadline is
slipping.”
The
keywords are separately and first. The magic dismiss-and-redirect
technique can be used anytime a conversational counterpart raises an
issue that you want to make go away. You don’t say that it’s
irrelevant, unimportant or unconnected with the matter at hand.
Instead, you graciously acknowledge its importance and then, with a
sweep of misdirection, consign it to the nether world of irrelevancies
and return to the primary issue on your agenda: “I appreciate your
bringing to my attention the fact that the attendance record of other
people in the department should be examined, Betty. I’d like to deal
with that separately. First, I need your agreement that you will come
to work every day on time.”
Or
you may say: “I understand that many employees are looking for
additional sources of income after the company announced the wage
freeze last week, Carlos. But I’d like to talk about that issue
separately. First, I need you to get your hand out of the cash
register.”
Dick Grote is a
nationally renowned consultant and speaker on performance appraisal
and author of the book, The
Performance Appraisal Question and Answer Book.
President of Grote Consulting Corporation, he lives in Dallas.
back to top back
to online exclusives archives
|