|
Implementing
a functional discount structure
Manufacturers
need to tread carefully when transitioning from
a single distributor discount structure to a “Discount for Value”
one
by Tom Halpin
If you are an independent distributor or a
manufacturer selling through distribution, you probably read a
lot about functional discount structures recently.
Functional discount
structures greatly contrast today’s most common form of manufacturer
discount, the “single discount” structure.
In the single discount
structure, manufacturers typically don’t recognize distributors for
their functional differences and distributors are extended a discount
off of manufacturer list price. So there could be a high-performing
distributor that offers far more value than another distributor, and
their discounts would be the same.
Functional discount structures
attempt to reward distributors according to the value they provide, as
determined by the manufacturer. For example, the manufacturer builds a matrix
that supports their business and then grades the distributor
accordingly. You might ask, “What does that look like?”
See the
example below.
| Activities |
Value
of each function as a percentage of total value (%) |
Mark activities
fulfilled |
| Ownership and possession |
|
25 |
|
| Ownership |
5 |
|
|
| Physical possession |
20 |
|
|
| Customer service |
|
15 |
|
| Fulfills promotional
media requests |
5 |
|
|
| Prices standard
products without assistance |
5 |
|
|
| Trained full-time
telephone assistance |
5 |
|
|
What you see above is a partial example of a functional
discount structure where the manufacturer assigned 40 percent of the
total value available to ownership and possession and customer
service.
There would be additional elements that would total
100 percent, which would then become the multiplier of the manufacturer’s
maximum discount on a given product.
The rationale behind the movement toward a functional
discount structure is understandable as manufacturers search for ways
to reward those distributors that offer more value than others.
However, having been involved in the unsuccessful implementation of a
functional discount program,
there are some lessons I’d like to share with those considering
a similar move.
First, distributors don’t like to be told how to run
their businesses. And functional discount structures foster that kind
of relationship, as they require distributors to be graded by their
suppliers.
This
is not a big deal if you are 3M, have lots of new product in
the pipeline and end-user demand is bursting at the seams.

However if
you are a $20 million manufacturer and have products on the downward
slope of the product life cycle curve (see graph above), you may want to
consider an intermediate program that bridges your current single-discount structure to the functional discount structure you envision
for the future.
As an example, an
intermediate program could
have three components making up the total discount, such as:
1) stocking
position,
2) point of sale information, and
3) average days to pay
requirements.
In this situation, the manufacturer
weighs each
component according to priority. I like this because it starts to change the rules (from single discount
structure to functional), but in a manner more reasonable to
your distribution partners.
Which types of distributors are better positioned to adapt to
a functional discount model? Without question larger distributors look
better on paper when compared to traditional distributors in a
functional discount structure. Their logistics networks and overall
sophistication allow them to offer more inventory and marketing
support to manufacturers.
However, larger distributors tend to
fall short when it comes to engaging with manufacturers to
create demand at the end user level. Advantage traditional
distributor.
Specifically, the traditional distributor has the edge
when the manufacturer has new, more technical products that need
missionary selling during the introduction phase of the product life
cycle. Larger distributors have trouble giving up that much mind share
and would prefer to be mass merchandisers of product than invest in
a longer, technical sale.
Speculation about the inefficiencies
of inventory management within the industrial distribution channel
abounds.
Exploiting those inefficiencies, distributors such as Grainger
and MSC are investing in regional warehouse models that allow them to
ship product next day to a large portion of the U.S., while carrying
less inventory than ever before.
This new model, much of which has
already come to fruition, will hurt some traditional
distributors. However, for those traditional distributors that have a
strong value proposition, functional discount structure or not, they
will compete, survive and prosper for years to come.
My final advice to manufacturers considering a functional
discount structure? Take stock of your value proposition, your
relationships with key distribution partners and your overall
objective in implementing a functional discount structure.
Count on
the fact that if you take a rigid stance without creating buy-in from
your key distribution partners on the front-end, there will be
backlash and implementation will be difficult.
However, if you have a
distributor council, solicit their input on the framework of the
functional discount structure and implementation of the program.
Distributors involved in the decision-making process will be
more likely to buy in over the long term. In parallel, a functional
discount structure inherently culls low-performing distribution
partners, making it an ideal mechanism for rationalizing your
distributor base.
I suspect we will see many manufacturers
roll out
functional discount programs in the coming months and years. This is a
good thing. Manufacturers that do not have a succinct channel
strategy, have tenuous relationships with their distribution base and
have mature products need to go slow, consider an intermediate
approach and poll key distribution partners up front. Failing to do so
will be damaging to your distribution network.
Tom Halpin is President of Titan Marketing, a consulting firm
focused on various sales and marketing disciplines. His 15-plus years of
sales and marketing experience in both manufacturing and distribution
provide a unique edge to potential clients. For more information,
visit www.titanmarketing.net
or contact Tom directly
at tom@titanmarketing.net.
back to top
back to online exclusives |