|
A
case study in opportunity
by
Bob Footlik
During
and after a recessionary period, the
astute distributor can seize many opportunities for competitive advantage. An entrepreneur
who prepares wisely and moves quickly can recover and grow through
outperforming the competition. One method of doing this is to jump into
markets where the recession created a vacuum. One of our clients
recently did this, and the lessons are instructive for all wholesale
distributors.
We
have worked with this client since 1983, when we designed a new central
distribution center for their corporate headquarters. The facility,
while handsome, is not lavish, and serves the needs of the
immediate market area during the day, with order picking for the
branches at night.
This provides 16-hour utilization of the building and
effectively doubles the stage areas and available loading docks.
Initially, the concept was to resupply the branches with materials on an
as-needed basis. As the branch business grew and information process
became more immediate, this function evolved into providing the branches
with materials according to strategic and well defined rules, and
picking all orders for next day will-call and delivery.
This
operational strategy significantly raised inventory turns, enhanced the
service level, and provided some unexpected bonuses. By pulling orders
under controlled conditions, without interruptions, productivity and
quality more than doubled. The warehouse staff could focus on what they
were doing, and a new warehouse management system directed them along an
optimum path, with multiple batched orders. This differed dramatically
from picking at the branch level where individuals pulled
one line, one order at a time, while waiting on the counter and
trying to receive truckloads of materials.
Surprisingly,
the new practices did not reduce labor at the branch level. The number
of lines written on every order changed. Tracking this
statistic showed a more than 30 percent increase in order line count and a similar
improvement in the dollars per order.
Gross profit skyrocketed. With
more business per order, and the same labor at branch level, but less
labor overall, the cost per line went way down. Couple this with the
improvements in quality and service from a planned, scheduled, reliable
system, and customer satisfaction began to win more market share. By
retraining all the branch employees, and redefining their role, more
time
is spent in focused selling, and less time is wasted by inefficient
operations. At one branch, this accelerated the need for more and better
space.
System
improvements highlight branch inefficiencies
With
increased counter trade, parking at one of the branches became scarce to
non-existent. Even with the acquisition of employee parking spaces a
block away, too little parking was available for peak times at the
counter. The customer’s solution of double parking, and using other parking lots, drew the attention of the
neighbors and the
local police.
Customer who received parking tickets
hesitated to
come back, and market share dropped. The distributor implemented a
stopgap solution of encouraging
more visits throughout the day. It gave certificates for food
and beverages at a local restaurant to counter customers from
10 a.m. to 1 p.m. Though expensive, it temporarily spread out the
demand to a more manageable level, and enhanced customer loyalty.
As business increased,
and resupply turned into an every-night operation, the lack of decent
loading facilities became more acute. Without a truck height dock and
adequate staging areas, dropping materials at night resulted in
congestion and confusion the next morning. Shifting to direct customer
delivery sidestepped some problems, but branch materials and
will-call orders still remained a significant problem.
Every deficiency of the branch building
magnified: low
ceiling heights, too little space for stock, an inefficient layout (they
used the wood shelving and homemade racks left over from a previous
tenant), inadequate lighting and a tight counter area. Clearly, a move to a better facility was in order,
but they were reluctant to move very far and risk losing counter
traffic. Everything pointed to a move but remained in limbo because
there was nowhere to move to.
Sometimes
a solution falls in your lap
A
chance conversation with the owner of a newly rented employee parking
lot revealed the landlord would downsize and needed
to sell his property to prevent bankruptcy. This building was far less
than perfect. The parking area and rear yard were environmentally
contaminated, the ceiling height was only 10 feet, many load bearing
interior walls cut into the space, mediocre loading facilities could not
accept modern trucks, poor roof maintenance necessitated replacement, and
obsolete environmental systems were worthless. All these problems reduced
the price.
Balanced
against this were the three most important attributes of real estate:
location, location and location. Unfortunately, tearing the building
down would open up the property to current zoning and code restrictions
that would preclude rebuilding at anywhere near the same size. The
question was: What can we do without breaking the bank?
This is
where we became part of a team effort.
An
architect is taught to design a structure, and the client will adapt to
it. The engineer designs the process or layout, and expects the
architect to wrap the building around it. Both strategies fail, especially in a major remodeling project. The role of the
materials handling consultant is to act as a bridge between the needs of
the operation and the physical reality of a facility that is intended as a marketing tool. The layout must take into consideration physical
reality and the client needs, as defined by personnel who will use the facility, and market demands.
Teamwork is an
absolute necessity.
First,
we needed to create a master plan for ultimate usage of the overall
facility. This necessitated measuring the existing structure and noting
significant structural features, along with potential areas for
improvement.
With knowledge came insight. For example, although many
walls were required to support the structure, a ribbon of windows just
under the roof indicated a lintel above the glass.
Significant parts of the walls could be removed without compromising
structural integrity.
A layout was designed to embrace this opportunity
with minimal costs initially for construction and enormous labor
savings for the operation.
In
a branch with a high inventory turn rate and overnight replenishment
from a master distribution center, ceiling height for overstock storage
is far less important than floor reachable fronts where employees can
easily pick products. The layout emphasized picking
fronts for the widest variety of products.
Shelving aisles were held
to 3 feet, and pallet rack aisles 8 feet so that two pallets
could pass. Cross aisles for adequate material flow were designed to do
double duty for night time staging, without compromising early morning
operation.
The
EPA provides an opportunity
Indoor
loading docks, a highly desirable feature, appeared problematic because
of the low ceiling and topography of the site. With some
adroit engineering and luck, we found a perfect solution.
An
attorney knowledgeable about the environment drafted a contract that forced
the seller to clean up the property and provide a “No Further
Remediation” (NFR) letter. This involved removing some of the dirt in
the parking lot, and paving over the area. Turning this to our
advantage, we moved and redesigned the loading docks to include
indoor and outdoor positions. By pitching the paved area toward the
rear, at the seller’s expense, we could accommodate a full 53-foot trailer
and rainwater runoff for an economical rate.
Examining
the roof structure revealed wood beams that could be easily cut over the
loading dock area. Rebuilding the roof four feet higher, and lowering
the paved approach provided sufficient height for an overhead door to
accommodate the longest trailers. Bringing the vehicle indoors shortened
the turning area outdoors, providing adequate space for truck
maneuvering. The overall cost was relatively low, and the building
modifications were easily accomplished with a chain saw.
Similarly,
channeling rain toward the available drainage necessitated paving a
yard storage area included in the master plan. By specifying the
materials and design for this area, no additional expense was incurred
by the buyer. Paving for storage was completely compatible with the
requirements of the EPA and local codes.
Staying
on track
As planning progressed, The architect made changes. In some
cases, these were justified by interpretations of the local building
inspectors and implemented. In other areas, a plan review by the
materials handling consultant, and the team, resulted in significant
improvements without additional cost.
Replacing
the roof with tar and gravel, without new insulation, was the least
expensive option, in terms of first cost. Adding 2 inches of insulation
under the same roofing material had a four-year payback. Switching to a membrane roof with 4-inch
insulation resulted in a three-year
payback in heating expenses and a significantly cooler building in the
summer.
Lighting
over every aisle was specified. The initial contractor proposal called
for standard fluorescent strip fixtures. Instead, we proposed using high
output fluorescent fixtures, with electronic ballasts and sensors to
turn on only the lights where people worked. Even without the
utility company rebate, this produced a two-year return on investment.
Adding
the electric utilities’ support takes the return to three months. It
also provided a significant public relations advantage. Environmental
awareness, coupled with rapid return, turns into a strong sales
point.
Selective
pruning
In
most remodeling projects, rebuilding is faster, easier and cheaper than cutting, fitting and patching.
Small spaces, inadequate washrooms, patchwork electrical and worn
out utilities made up the office are. We removed all the walls except those
perfectly situated for the master plan. Everything fell into
place when we moved the front door to enhance the first impression of
the property and redesigned the counter entrance for ease of customer
parking and loading. Essentially, we gutted the area and removed
anything dead or extraneous. This left only the best parts
and none of the compromises.
The client team’s definition of the
function and level of finish for the display areas proved
the key factor in this design work. With a majority of
the orders “will call-with add on,” customers had
discretionary buying power. Self-service displays and a bright, inviting
counter area cater to their wants as well as their needs.
Building
more market share
Customer loyalty and business is appreciated. In this
manner, the facility becomes a reward, and the counter personnel emphasize this.
They encourage tours and frequently invite visitors to the warehouse.
Once there,
customers readily see
how organized the operation has become, and how obsolete, dirty and
dingy the competitors are in comparison. This raises the
buyer’s expectations. Business is booming, as the word gets around.
Any competitor could remodel their existing facility, but in the light
of diminishing business and market share, they don't want to spend
money. In addition, as the market turns around, an
already meager supply of available buildings becomes more expensive.
This puts them further behind, and may even preclude catching up. In
a highly competitive market, they can only cut prices
and decrease margins, a recipe for bankruptcy.
Still time to change.
If
our client had the wisdom to see an opportunity and seize it, so
can
you. At the very least, find the perfect location for a new facility. If
this is an existing structure, available now, an investment partnership
may be a vehicle for controlling it so the facility will be
available when you need it. Renting the property to others can provide
immediate income, and help fund future remodeling. Similarly, tying up a
parcel of land through outright purchase, or a first option, guarantees
availability when you are ready to move.
Putting
a master plan and team in place now, and preparing for the future,
guarantees you can move quickly at the perfect moment.
Bob Footlik is a licensed professional
engineer who has worked extensively in the fields of material
handling, plant layout, packaging and management systems for
Distributors. The firm of Footlik and Associates was founded in 1948 and
serves as staff warehousing and materials handling consultants to six
trade associations. Readers of this publication can receive up to one
hour of free consultation to review any plans, photos or a video of
their facilities and operations. Footlik and Associates is located at
2521 Gross Point Rd., Evanston, Illinois 60601. Phone (847) 328-5644.
Visit their Web site at www.footlik.com.
back to top
back to online exclusives |